Dave Robillard wrote: > Though that's starting to sound like we're implementing a symbol > system... probably going to be wanting one of those at some point > regardless. Is that what this really is? (probably doesn't affect > implementation much, just a hypothetical question).
Well, it's just atoms. Like in X, or Windows DDE. > If it is just for URIs, we could maybe take advantage of prefixes and > save some space in that table? lv2:Plugin is a lot nicer to deal with > in all cases than http://lv2plug.in/ns/spec/lv2core#Plugin.... I'd prefer it to be kept general, but that's just me. After all, that memory will not be used except during plugin load or reconfiguration. Maybe it's that I can't imagine how would prefix-based mapping work reliably (would every URI be first turned into prefix form, then stored or looked up in the table?). Krzysztof _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
