Nedko Arnaudov wrote: > - this seems like trying to push something square into round hole. But > if that will help, then it may be worth to implement it
I agree - this is hackish and far from optimal. In the ideal world we wouldn't need it. If it was designed this or similar way from start, we wouldn't need it. But the only alternative we had, was confusing to me and to Dave, which is not a good sign :) Perhaps none of us here is particularly patient when it comes to trying out new things, but I bet an average user is much less patient and less willing to learn. OK. Users should read documentation before doing stuff. They shouldn't try to things they _can't_ do. They shouldn't file bad bug reports. They shouldn't get angry and frustrated after first minor failure with the new piece of software. Packagers should know what they're doing. Politicians shouldn't lie and steal. But I'm not holding my breath :) And that's why I tend to prefer solutions that are fool-proof/human-nature-proof. Krzysztof _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
