On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 14:43 +0100, Fons Adriaensen wrote: > With the release of Jack 0.109 we now have a (hopefully) > stable API for midi-over-jack. This set me to consider what > would be required to modify Aeolus to use this system. > And I did not like the conclusions. > > Is it a good idea to insert a 30-year old data format > that mixes real-time and general data on a single stream > into a real-time audio processing API ? I don't think so. > > 1. Note on/off and controller events now can be 'sample > accurate'. That's nice to have. But [...]
> 2. *All* MIDI data now has to pass through the RT-audio > audio thread, even if it's not related to any RT operations > at all [...] So, after this long wait of things being different and incompatible in SVN and a release /finally/ coming out, you NOW decide to bring all this up? Large SYSEX is a difficult problem that was deliberately not considered. Sub-sample accurate stamps would be great though, and I bet they would have gotten in too - but it's a little late for that now, isn't it? -DR- _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
