On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 00:18 +0000, Christian Schoenebeck wrote: > Am Montag, 21. Januar 2008 21:58:24 schrieb Lars Luthman: > > On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 22:47 +0100, Benno Senoner wrote: > > > Yes I agree with what you said, > > > but better to start the discussion with them now because > > > we will not know if and when if will become free software. > > > > Until it actually becomes free software I'm not interested in it at all. > > Good you let us know, but this is not about Reaper, it's about LV2 and > whether > it could be improved. > > BTW there were rumours Reaper might become open source one day. But as you > might imagine, such a process would presumably happen gently step by step, so > that kind of attitude could really destroy the whole process.
The mail i replied to was about Reaper. But I really doubt that the authors of a piece of software that I haven't even used would care about my attitude, or lack thereof, when deciding what to do with their code. --ll
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
