On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 23:23 +0000, Patrick Shirkey wrote: > Possibly the most important thing that we can draw from this is that the > LV2 docs are not complete enough for a busy closed source developer to see > the viability of the format. Everything he mentioned was shot down in > flames so it's not a case of the format being well thought out as he > explicitly stated.
This is true, a FAQ or "why is LV2 different/better" document would probably help. For people used to things like VST it can take a bit of thinking for the LV2 idea to 'click'. -DR- _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
