Am Donnerstag, 24. Januar 2008 schrieb Krzysztof Foltman: > Paul Davis wrote: > > You read it wrong. For two different reasons. First, the same mistake > > than Arnold made earlier. The GPL (whatever version) is the text that > > lays out the terms of a license. Anyone can refer to this text but then > > add exceptions, extensions. I can even say "Its licensed under the terms > > of GPLv3 excluding every clause, plus the follow paragraph...". > Well, what's more, at least one well known project from Free Software > Foundation uses exactly that: GPL plus "special exception" changing the > conditions slightly (allowing for use in other software without making > them covered by GPL). > I think it may be a good reason to think that such practices are > allowed/approved by FSF.
That is called the LGPL... Arnold -- visit http://www.arnoldarts.de/ --- Hi, I am a .signature virus. Please copy me into your ~/.signature and send me to all your contacts. After a month or so log in as root and do a "rm -rf /". Or ask your administrator to do so...
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
