On Thursday 24 January 2008 13:09:55 Bob Ham wrote: > > In a debug version, it could be desirable, but for "production" use > > (sorry for webspeak) it is unacceptable. It should be as fault-tolerant > > as possible in those situations. > > Yes, you're right, JACK should be as fault tolerant as possible :-)
I believe everyone on this list agrees on that. Would you have any ideas for improving the current situation? I have the impression that JACK should be able to produce a lot more debug on demand than it currently does; maybe this could ease the bug hunting? Juuso _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
