On Jan 27, 2008 5:50 AM, porl sheean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 27/01/2008, Mlf Conv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > So LinuxSampler is basically a pure GPLed computer program. > > > > Marek > > > > > > i'm not trying to add fuel to the fire or anything, but if this is the > case, and the gpl protects against the sort of thing they are worried about > anyway, why go through all the hassle of adding the clause that has > obviously (whether deserved or not) caused so much controversy? wouldn't it > be better to simply have a faq item stating that the gpl prohibits this > behaviour anyway? > > i hope this comes across right without upsetting anyone, as it is > obviously a delicate topic, and i am just trying to understand it better > myself, not cause more issues :) > > porl >
Yes, that's what i was suggesting, when i talked to Christian last time. Or making an amendment to GPL which is fully GPL compatible if it feels to vague. Marek
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
