On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 10:42 +0000, Christian Schoenebeck wrote: > Am Dienstag, 29. Januar 2008 06:25:31 schrieben Sie: > > On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 03:16 +0000, Christian Schoenebeck wrote: > > > So get it: there is NOT only one definition of the term "open source" > > > when standing alone. Like with many unspecific short terms, different > > > people have different opinions of those short terms. > > > > Yours just coincidentally is shared by virtually nobody and it just so > > happens that this arbitrary definiton matches exactly your software > > which you wish to call 'open source' for PR reasons. > > Right, just by the majority of e.g. all Windows and OS X users, hmm who > reflect the majority of all users anyway. And right, I forgot I'm promoting a > product. Thanks Dave for enlighten us about the truth! Now I clearly see > there is only white and nothing else than white! Well, maybe black, but the > black ones are evil by definition and don't count.
Then why not call it MS or AS and be done with it? -- Patrick Shirkey Boost Hardware Ltd. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev