On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 23:38 +0100, Marek wrote: > > Despite what Marek says about the evils of commercial exploitation or > > whatever, by licensing under the GPL developers /encourage/ commercial > > use - so long as changes get contributed back to the community. > > > My product is a router which uses your software in an unmodified form. > It pulls firmware directly from net. I don't offer anything for > download. Note, this would *not* be a distribution of your software, > this would be selling of my router. > > How do you solve this issue?
What issue? You're using GPLed software in a manner permitted by the licence. Where's the issue? > > These are my wishes, and countless other developer's wishes, despite > > what a certain non-developer (who ironically only exploits GPL software, > > not creates it) might say. > > How do you know i'm not using MacOSX? What's that got to do with the price of mince? > If these are you wishes, how about simply not taking my point of view, > or my advice? > How about not insulting someone who's trying to help those who are > interested, if you are not interested? > > > > > People who want to make a CD full of free software and sell it, at a > > profit, are more than welcome to do so. > > That's distribution. Not selling software. And that, folks, is why you shouldn't take drugs. Marek, lay off the mind-altering substances, okay? You're starting to worry us a bit here. Gordon _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
