On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Albert Graef wrote: > Kjetil S. Matheussen wrote: > > The last sentence was extremely bad formulated. I ment that > > the syntax for accessing faust needs to be different, because > > programming in snd is s-expressions based. > > So what you need is an unparser for s-expressions that produces Faust's > infix syntax, this shouldn't be hard. >
Exactly. Thats easy. My "unparser" for C also interprets strings as C code, which can also be done for faust code, so that way you also have a way to get full power from the destination language. > > This whole operation shouldn't take more than a few ms. > > Hmm, the Faust compiler needs its time, as does the C++ compiler. I > don't think that you can achieve that right now. > > Ouch. I thought the Faust compiler was quite fast? (I've just used the online compiler) And I didn't think about C++. How much time does the faust compilation and c++ compilation take? More than 1 second on a fairly modern machine? But even if its many seconds, I think its worth doing. :-) _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
