On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 03:40:12PM +0000, Bob Ham wrote: > On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 15:32 +0100, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> > In other words, ** you could write this function today **. > > The functionality you want does not require any changes > > to jack. > > The problem is, you're still going to get client authors who say "Well, > I have to implement insanely-annoying-automatic-port-connection because > I have to cater for the people who don't use $your_system" By bringing > autoconnection into JACK itself, there's a standardised, authorised, > proven, approved method. It's none of those, and it's crippled. People who think that calling one (1, uno) function is a problem should not be writing any form of applications, because they won't get very far. Typically you need tens, hundreds, thousands. Raising sheep may be a better occupation for them. I will respect the opinions, tastes, and personal preferences of anyone who demonstrates a minimal amount of engagement, but _not_ of someone who is so blatantly lazy as you suggest (I don't mean you, but the people you refer to), and stupid enough to admit it. Ciao, -- FA Laboratorio di Acustica ed Elettroacustica Parma, Italia Lascia la spina, cogli la rosa. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
