On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 22:23 +0200, Juuso Alasuutari wrote: > I'm assuming you meant to post this to the list, Paul. > > In reply to your comment: > > One of the motives behind jack-dbus is that a JACK control application > shouldn't have to be RT capable since it's not processing any > realtime-sensitive data anyway. From a technical perspective, could > libjack be extended with such a non realtime control API?
there are many parts of the JACK API that are not RT-bound. in fact, basically *all* of it except for a clients process() callback, which a client is not required to register. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
