On Feb 5, 2008 4:56 PM, Bob Ham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If you want 'real' session management, you also want to save the > > jack-settings > > per session. > > This was addressed elsewhere. The issue is the dynamicity of JACK. > Rewriting LASH to use D-Bus because you don't want to fix JACK is > lunacy. That's precisely *NOT* the reason why me, and probably quite a few others want to use <you_name_it> protocol to control jack.
>From Fons : > > That being said, I still do favor D-Bus over OSC. > It's local only, no network support. Right. Then again, all we need is a better control framework in libjack and let people develop with whatever protocol they like, be it OSC, D-Bus, a direct use of the API or smoke signals. I don't understand why this disagreement goes on while a simple solution on which everyone could agree has already been brought up. __________________ Marc-Olivier Barre, MarcO'Chapeau. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
