On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 10:41 +0200, Christian Schoenebeck wrote: > So in practice, if the results are very close together anyway, probably not > even noticeable, I would definitely prefer to spend that time on other tasks > and enjoy the fact that the implementation compiles with very good > performance results on other architectures as well. >
Then you will probably like this run of ./mixdown: Benchmarking mixdown (WITH coeff): pure C++ : 150 ms <-- pretty good, eh? ;-) ASM SSE : 140 ms GCC vector extensions : 150 ms This is with -ftree-vectorize added to your compile options. > CU > Christian > _______________________________________________ > Linux-audio-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev -- _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
