if there was an open standard for this sort of thing that we could implement in software and interface directly with jack etc then it would make my idea redundant.... i would love to see such a thing though :)
what does netjack (or netjackmp) lack compared to these implementations? i'm still not entirely sure of netjack's synchronising abilities for instance. porl 2008/8/1 Paul Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 10:10 +0200, Fons Adriaensen wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 10:27:29AM +1200, Eliot Blennerhassett wrote: >> >> > Check these out: >> > http://www.cobranet.info - has a silicon implementation >> > http://www.axiaaudio.com/livewire/default.htm >> > http://www.ethersound.com/ >> > http://www.audinate.com/ >> >> Since you seem to be into this sort of thing: can cobranet >> be implemented in software, using standard network interfaces >> (assuming you have a realtime kernel, and the interfaces are >> dedicated to this task) ? > > It can. Harrison does this on their consoles/routers. Its not trivial to > make it work right, but it can certainly be done and the channel count > is high. > > --p > > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-audio-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev > _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
