On Fri, 2008-09-12 at 12:14 -0700, Justin Smith wrote: > If you just did a simple phase inversion, you would lose half of the > information you could be sending to the dac, you could easily use an > algorithm that sets things up so you have full bit resolution (ie. > double the rated resolution of a single channel).
So what it is the magic number then for improved resolution? At first I thought intuitively: -3dB! But now I am not so sure. I can't explain to an audiemce why -3 is a better number than any other. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
