On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 4:38 PM, Paul Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 2008-09-28 at 16:04 +0900, David Cournapeau wrote: >> >> So it does not look like pulseaudio is that great if you want to >> support various linux and have very little needs for audio. > > As Lennart tried to make reasonably clear, the primary goal of > PulseAudio is NOT to act as a new API, but to act as a new > *infrastructure* that supports existing APIs transparently.
I got that, but you missed the context of the discussion: both victor and me were talking about the API. Victor mentioned pulseaudio API as an easy one, and I expressed my concern about availability of pulseaudio in my case (extremely limited audio needs, but available on many distributions, potentially quite old). cheers, David _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
