> You are urged to revisit this assumption. Every single one of those > systems started from a similar premise as you are now claiming.
> Of course, if you just want to waste time programming instead of making > cool sounds etc, go right ahead. Otherwise you will be at least 10x as > productive using pd as you will in C++. Paul, Perhaps you were thrown off by my statement that "I want to build my own system using linux audio native capabilities". And I sincerely apologise for that! I don't want to (or think I "can") build another pd/ChucK. I simply don't have that kind of intention.I assure you that the system I have in mind is not an audio programming language, although linux audio is an integral part of it. ------- -.- 1/f ))) --. ------- ... http://www.algomantra.com
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
