On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 11:41:49PM +0100, Fons Adriaensen wrote: > On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 12:14:32AM +0200, Hannu Savolainen wrote: > > > Instead this kind of monitoring can be given to a dedicated program (if > > a simple shell script cannot do it). This keeps the actual application > > clean and reduces the risk that it doesn't work with a MADI card from > > some other manufacturer. > > That is exactly what I'm doing, and I have already told you > at least three times. That 'dedicated program' is still _an > application_. And no, it can't be 'a simple script' it is > doing a lot more than you can imagine - including configuring > a lot of external hardware, sometimes directly, sometimes by > talking to daemons on other machines, etc. etc. > > It doesn't have to work with any other card. We are relying > on the functionality of very specific external hardware anyway. > Unless you know a replacement for e.g. and RME ADI648, and you > can 'abstract' both this and the ADI648 to the same remote > control API without any loss of functionality.
considering, that you already have a solution for the problem, posted by Clemens Ladish, this discussion is just for fun, right ? please continue, reading this thread is making my day since 3 days :) i have a question: is the sync resetting a bug in alsa ? does anybody have an interest in an ALSA bug getting fixed ? -- torben Hohn _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
