I'm not really sure it was there for a good reason :)
I'm not in a position to test the patch at the moment, and I've lost
the CVS tree for that package, so I can't see if it was ever changed
to +1. but if someone else can test it I'll put out a new version with
the fix.
- Steve
On 27 Nov 2008, at 09:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
guess the right addresat should be LAD for this...
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 26 November 2008 17:49:53 GMT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [LAU] timemachine click bug
I think timemachine has had a bug during the last three years or
so. It
introduces a zeroed (extra?) sample after the pre-record buffersize in
the outputfile.
Ive used a hacked version myself for some time, which seems to
function
- at least the click is gone.
The hack just takes away a '+ 1' at a strategic place (see diffs
below),
but im sure its there for some reason! Maybe more C-fluent persons
here
could look at the code and see whats a real fix?
The source is here: http://plugin.org.uk/timemachine/timemachine-0.3.1.tar.gz
-anders
*** /tmp/timemachine-0.3.1/src/threads.c 2008-11-26
18:24:35.000000000 +0100
--- /tmp/timemachine-0.3.1/src/threads.c~ 2005-07-18
16:03:06.000000000 +0200
***************
*** 157,164 ****
for (j = 0; j < BUF_SIZE && i < pre_size; i++, j++) {
for (k = 0; k < num_ports; k++) {
buf[j * num_ports + k] =
! /* pre_buffer[k][(i + 1 + pre_pos) % pre_size]; */
! pre_buffer[k][(i + pre_pos) % pre_size];
}
}
sf_writef_float(out, buf, j);
--- 157,163 ----
for (j = 0; j < BUF_SIZE && i < pre_size; i++, j++) {
for (k = 0; k < num_ports; k++) {
buf[j * num_ports + k] =
! pre_buffer[k][(i + 1 + pre_pos) % pre_size];
}
}
sf_writef_float(out, buf, j);
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
I think timemachine has had a bug during the last three years or
so. It
introduces a zeroed (extra?) sample after the pre-record buffersize in
the outputfile.
Ive used a hacked version myself for some time, which seems to
function
- at least the click is gone.
The hack just takes away a '+ 1' at a strategic place (see diffs
below),
but im sure its there for some reason! Maybe more C-fluent persons
here
could look at the code and see whats a real fix?
The source is here: http://plugin.org.uk/timemachine/timemachine-0.3.1.tar.gz
-anders
*** /tmp/timemachine-0.3.1/src/threads.c 2008-11-26
18:24:35.000000000 +0100
--- /tmp/timemachine-0.3.1/src/threads.c~ 2005-07-18
16:03:06.000000000 +0200
***************
*** 157,164 ****
for (j = 0; j < BUF_SIZE && i < pre_size; i++, j++) {
for (k = 0; k < num_ports; k++) {
buf[j * num_ports + k] =
! /* pre_buffer[k][(i + 1 + pre_pos) % pre_size]; */
! pre_buffer[k][(i + pre_pos) % pre_size];
}
}
sf_writef_float(out, buf, j);
--- 157,163 ----
for (j = 0; j < BUF_SIZE && i < pre_size; i++, j++) {
for (k = 0; k < num_ports; k++) {
buf[j * num_ports + k] =
! pre_buffer[k][(i + 1 + pre_pos) % pre_size];
}
}
sf_writef_float(out, buf, j);
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
