On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 01:23:20PM +0400, alex stone wrote: > Will we continue to have a Jack version minus the dbus infrastructure, > once jack2 is released?
As an uninvolved observer I am wondering why the dbus control interface, if it is indeed only one of many potential interfaces using the c/c++ API, is not packaged separately as an optional add-on. If it is indeed a compile time option, the design is flawed IMHO. Generally, the new control API sounds like a good idea but why can't the new features be exposed as new command line tools without dbus dependency per default? So you want the dbus interface? Fine, just install jack-control-dbus or whatever. Or am I not getting it? Jan _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
