> does anyone have any idea on the uptake of VST 3 ? Seems only VST3 works well on 64-bit systems. (VST 2 is supported, but runs in a high-latency 32-bit emulation environment). My hunch is VST3 uptake will track 64-bit Windows uptake.
Jeff > Is this becoming the standard and 2.* being quickly > deprecated? > Comparing the two, there is a lot of stuff in VST3, it > seems quite heavy, which seems to be a change > from the relative simplicity of 2.*. Also 3 does not look > backwards compatible (so older plugins would not > work with it). > On the FOSS front then, with 3 we are stuck again > with Steinberg's terms. So my question is: are > developers in general sticking with 2.* or has everyone > moved to 3. Again, my question has an educational > slant, should we be teaching 3 or 2 (or both, if we > are teaching VST at all, that is) ? > > Thanks > > Victor _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
