2009/6/15 Krzysztof Foltman <[email protected]>: > Stefano D'Angelo wrote: >>> >>> <whisper> Since it's useful, doesn't break anything, and trivially >>> easy, there is no reason for not adding such a bit. </whisper> >>> >> >> If it is added to the next version LADSPA itself, then it's fine, >> otherwise anyone could think like that and you can imagine the >> *POTENTIAL* mess. >> > > I think way too many things in Linux audio are concerned about potential > this and potential that, all while ignoring real problems/deficiencies. > Idealism taken to extremes and all that.
Well, I just misread the original post (somehow I thought Jorn wanted to add the hint outside of the LADSPA spec, that would cause lots of problems). > I already support enums in LADSPA via LRDF, but someone introduced those two > bits and they were done "properly" (without breaking anything that used to > work before), I'd support them in Calf, too. Two bits? Stefano P.S.: Regarding LV2 Calf plugins, could you use urn:ladspa:12345-style URIs as specified here (http://lv2plug.in/docs/index.php?title=Replace_plugin) for dc:replace? ;-) _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
