On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 08:53:27PM +0200, Tim Goetze wrote: > [Fons Adriaensen] > > > >This makes is backwards compatible, as no new field is required > >in the descriptor struct. > > AFAICS, binary compatibility is not compromised by an expanded > descriptor struct, as long as additional members are appended to the > struct.
This is not strictly true. Indexing an array of such structs will fail if the code doing it is generated by a compiler that didn't use the exact size. But that will indeed not to happen, as hosts are assumed to use ladspa_descriptor() provided by the plugin. Ciao, -- FA Io lo dico sempre: l'Italia รจ troppo stretta e lunga. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
