Krzysztof Foltman wrote: > Such a change could also give you problems if you expose > implementation-defined values (as opposed to real-life-compatible units) > to users. Think of backward compatibility, for example.
good point. >> While ideas are being tossed about, here are some more... >> > Be careful: I can't speak for everyone, but after years of stagnation it > would be nice to get a useful 1.2 out of the door without trying to cram > every possible good idea into it. fair play, it was late and I was overly enthusiastic :) does anyone have access to ladspa.org? perhaps these and other ideas can be noted in some sort of a roadmap? regards, Fraser _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
