On Mon, 22.06.09 23:19, Jörn Nettingsmeier ([email protected]) wrote:
> so what is this about? rt users want absolute control over their > machine. anybody who can tolerate some arbitrary bits of policy thrown > at them during work is by definition not an rt user. > rt users must be trustable with root access, at least in terms of cpu > governance, which is what rtlimits achivev just fine. What is so difficult to understand that rtkit is not intended to be a solution for hardcore rt users? rtkit is not for you! Let me repeat this: RTKIT IS NOT FOR YOU! rtkit is a just missing piece of the puzzle that allows distros to enable RT by default for their desktop users. And rtkit doesn't break RLIMIT_PRIO, it isn't even activated when that is set. Let me repeat this, too: RTKIT DOESN'T BREAK RLIMIT_RTPRIO! It was clearly a bad idea to post about rtkit on lad. It is a big waste of time fighting this through against all those desktop-haters, fdo-haters, dbus-haters, who apparently believe I am out to take away their freedom to run their systems the way want. I really don't need this shit. The amount of constructive criticism in this thread is next to zero, nobody even bothers to read the README before just fudding around. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering Red Hat, Inc. lennart [at] poettering [dot] net http://0pointer.net/lennart/ GnuPG 0x1A015CC4 _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
