Sampo this is not true. The license is in every source file:
This Java Class is part of the jMusic API version 1.5, March 2004.> Copyright (C) 2000 Andrew Sorensen & Andrew Brown This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or any later version. This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for more details. You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. > Yep. That makes a lot of sense. Is the jmusic in question this one > http://jmusic.ci.qut.edu.au/ ? > > It seems this software is treading deep in unlicensed waters. I can't > find any notion of the license under which jmusic is distributed. If one > googles the site for "license" (http://www.google.com/search?q=site% > 3Ajmusic.ci.qut.edu.au+license ) you can find three hits, all about GPL > on _examples_ using jmusic. The source distribution of jmusic has no > licensing information at all. They might be in violation of sourceforges > user agreements. > > Jeeze. This makes one wonder how people are not more careful about how > they release their work? > > > Sampo > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-audio-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
