On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 23:01 -0400, [email protected] wrote: > On Tuesday 28 July 2009 22:38:03 David Robillard wrote: > > at revision 12, this project is (in my non-lawyer non-authoritative > > opinion, etc), very obviously and correctly licensed under the GPL > > version 2 or later, in the way recommended by the FSF. > > The raw code seems okay over there. Running ant to make a dist > package results in something that violates the GPL if a user were > to distribute it.
No, it does not, and even if it did, this would not be a GPL violation on Prof. Keller's part. -dr _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
