Arnold Krille wrote: > On Sunday 02 August 2009 15:40:33 Ralf Mardorf wrote: > >> On the other hand, if a company pays you a regular salary and the job is >> named "developer", it might include that a copyright will subrogate to >> the employer, even if there isn't any stipulation saying this. Here I'm >> not sure. >> > > It is not bound to the job description "developer" but by the job description > "worker" / "employee". > I repeat: Standard contracts say that _all_ work you do for a company belongs > to that company. It doesn't matter whether its some creative or developing or > "just" technical thing you do (even fetching garbage falls in there). > Standard > contracts say, in copyright terms, that you give them exclusive rights to > publish and use your works. >
Okay, thank you. > Arnold > > PS: The weekends don't feel right without a discussion about licenses and > copyrights, do they? In addition I had a phone call discussion about god and had no time to compile some needed stuff. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
