One thing I think everyone can appreciate is when there is an issue concerning licensing that the responsible party does not turn around on another list/group and make it sound like the "open source" people are bad guys preventing others from doing what they want.
The actually facts of the situation are that people should make an effort to get things sorted out before they ever distribute any code or binaries. Attempts by others to set things right means they are well-intentioned, not the other way around as expressed on that group. Shifting the burden of responsibility onto others is a good way to have issues come back at you in the future. It really does not show good intentions. I mean, how difficult would it have been to just mention there was a problem and that it would be fixed as things progress. Not very hard at all. So there was no need for trying to paint others as the culprits in some bad situation which the person brought on their self. Behavior like that just makes me even more inclined to fork an application because I know that I will respect licenses and clear all the little issues up. Plus I welcome discussion, whether agreeing or disagreeing with my own views. If you want to discuss things you can do so by joining the Improvisor mailing list on the project (http://sf.net/projects/improvisor). Anybody can, that includes Mr. Keller, because that is how people cooperate and participate, by not shutting people out. Raymond _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
