On Monday 03 Aug 2009 21:29:48 Michael Fisher wrote: > No problem. It's not really fair to put a 'skin' around free software, > call it your own, and then sell it. The only thing I ask is that my > name be left out of the letter that may be written to them. The reason > is, that I personally know one of the staff members at the Beat Kangz. I > just would hate to have it cause any trouble. My friend personally > doesn't have anything to do with this violation, he just works for > them. I hope that isn't a problem with you.
Well, calling it your own is out of order, but as long as they release their source code as required by the GPL, then selling it is a Good Thing (TM). I hope the LADs agree with me. I would certainly be delighted if my GPL'd stuff (which isn't directly related to LAD) got sold. It would mean more GPL'd applications. I hope they decide to use the GPL rather than reinvent the wheel. Let's hope Beat Kangz will see the light if the benefits are explained to them properly. N/. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
