Hallo, Sampo Savolainen hat gesagt: // Sampo Savolainen wrote: > So, at least at the moment I'm leaning towards accepting the offered > solution to the violation. Any thoughts?
I'd say, accept it. Beat Kangzs seem to be willing to fix their mistake, which is all that this is about. It's not uncommon for companies coming from a certain commercial/proprietary background to make mistakes when dealing with the GPL. Even people coming from an open source background make mistakes in regard to licensing, so it's nothing to get crazy about if it gets fixed. Maybe you can point them to this page so they can learn some best practices how to avoid such mistakes in the future: http://www.gpl-violations.org/faq/vendor-faq.html Ciao -- Frank _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
