2009/8/5 Frank Barknecht <[email protected]>: > Quotint the GPL-FAQ. However applied to LADSPA this would mean, that > GPL-plug-ins are not allowed in commercial software *at all*,
That's been *my* understanding of the GPL too: It just doesn't want GPL'd software to be used by proprietary software in any way. That's why LGPL was introduced: to be used in circumstances, where pure GPL is too coercive. I've been surprised, that some (most ?) plugins were using the GPL, but thought it was intentional, that authors wouldn't want non-free-software to use LADSPA etc. If they (you) would like to allow non-FLOSS to use the plugins, rather use the LGPL, I think. -- e.r. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
