PS: > Paul Davis wrote: >> 2009/8/6 Ralf Mardorf <[email protected]>: >> >>> Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote: >>> >>>> [snip] >>>> >>>> all this means that if somebody uses GPL'd code without releasing >>>> under >>>> GPL him/herself, s/he is in breach of contract with the original >>>> author(s). it *does* *not* *mean* that you can now assume the entire >>>> package is up for grabs under the terms of the GPL. >>>> >>> IANAL, but with a certainty of 99,9% this is the actual state of >>> affairs >>> how German courts does accept/fit the GPL to the German law and it >>> seems >>> to be the same for the Netherlands, >>> >> >> citations? references? google fu magic? >> > > http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_General_Public_License > http://lwn.net/Articles/61292/
The context for the Netherlands is, you need to quote correctly: > and it seems to be the same for the Netherlands, because of a similar > copyright law that someone from the list described _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
