Ralf Mardorf <[email protected]> writes: > I welcome ladish, but most of the times I would like to have a > Linuxsampler DSSI, a Hydrogen DSSI etc. ;).
You prefer DSSI over LV2? In recent years I've spent lot of time on both JACK session handling problem and LV2. The two technologies have something in common and have their pros and cons. I think that both are needed. JACK plugins (apps in session handling environment) provide better separatation and allow the developer to do more tricks, it is the more flexible. LV2 plugins provide less overhead, better match the plugin image in users`s heads, but are more restricte. The LV2 GUI problem is especially bad, it slows LV2 adoption because hosts and plugins need to use same GUI toolkit. LV2 External UI extension maybe will fix this, time will tell. Maybe JACK plugins are more viable than LV2 plugins. After all we have more JACK mini-apps than complex LV2+DSSI+LADSPA plugins. -- Nedko Arnaudov <GnuPG KeyID: DE1716B0>
pgpscJZEOpirH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
