Ralf Mardorf wrote: > Christian wrote: >> For the keys I love aftertouch :) >> > > An option that can regulate the number of the aftertouch events that are > send is useful. Some sequencers have an option to reduce the amount of > recorded aftertouch events, but not every sequencer is able to do it. > Using aftertouch sometimes produce too many unneeded data, that can > become a problem. >
talking about aftertouch (aka key-pressure), there's two different kinds: "channel aftertouch" (independent of key/pitch) and "polyphonic aftertouch" (per key/pitch). the later is seldom implemented but it might give an edge on this "open-source midi keyboard" project. it also generates a greater amount of events as Ralf warns about cheers -- rncbc aka Rui Nuno Capela [email protected] _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
