So what /should/ then be the new name of the spinlock_t that is actually spinning?
My vote is for spinning_spinlock_t, because that is what I say when I try to explain the difference. Implicitly also suggests that normal spinlocks in an RT context aren't really /that/ urgently spinning. /jma On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 10:46 +0200, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote: > http://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/357800/0fb8fb6f0975403c/ > > interesting coverage as usual, thanks to lwn for the free-link feature. > _______________________________________________ > Linux-audio-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
