On 11/09/2009 05:58 AM, David Robillard wrote: > Yes, we need a > compatibility matrix or something along those lines. Everyone agrees. > There is really no need to continually state it. > > SOMEONE MAKE ONE ON THE DAMNED WIKI THEN >
I have offered my time for this project. I'm still waiting for the dust to settle on the best way to present the data. A compatibility matrix is not out of the question. However from my experience with alsa matrix it is hard to keep it up to date. I would like to take things a step further an automate that process if at all possible. In regards to the issue with specifiying UI's I thin the best way around the problem is to provide template code that people can work from. It doesn't have to be the most flexible method that is known. It just has to present a simple and elegant approach to the issue. Having a template for every language and tool set that can be used to build an ui that a busy but interested developer can quickly slot into their own project with minimum tweaking will be a major step towards opening up compatibility and getting more applications and ui's built. Patrick Shirkey Boost Hardware Ltd _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
