torbenh wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 08:34:53PM +0100, Karl Hammar wrote: > >> Florian Faber: >> >>> Karl Hammar wrote: >>> >>>> [..ethernet transports..] >>>> And we are missing an open protocol for this. >>>> >>> What is wrong with netjack? It's made for point-to-point and very >>> simple. You just have to solve the clock issue unless you want to lose >>> bit transparency. >>> >> Ohh, sorry, I got the impression it was not ready. I don't mind being >> wrong in that. >> > > may i kindly ask what gave you that impression ? > i admit that some jack versions in svn were broken for the LAN use-case > because i am focussing on making it work for wireless and > transcontinental internet connections. > > but the lan use-case it pretty trivial and doesnt need all this deadline > machinery. > > if you just want to build a network soundcard, and use jack on a > computer with that, its ready for 3 years now !!! > > having more than one network soundcard, and keeping stuff in sync is > more tricky. it requires that you can control the wordclock on that > soundcard, and you need a special version of alsa_out.c > which instead of resampling controls the wordclock frequency. > > Would it be easy to use netjack also without jack running on the network soundcard?
/ Hans -- Hans Wilmers NOTAM Nedre Gate 5 N-0551 Oslo Norway tlf.: +47 22358065 http://www.notam02.no _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
