On Tuesday 15 December 2009 15:36:04 Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote: > On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, Paul Davis wrote: > > why not use glib? as some folk like to say: "even Qt does these days" :) > True... but I'm just trying to avoid a "dependency creep" > (which becomes a bigger issue when porting to Windows). > No glib hate. I just don't want to add a dependency to glib > so that I can use a single class template.
But when its a template, why not include that header in your project? The original shouldn't change that much that it qualifies as a "must have external dependency"? Arnold
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
