On Mon, 21 Dec 2009, Patrick Shirkey wrote:
> The only person I can recall who had an explicit objection to it was > Fons, who said he would stop using jack if it was accepted. Given that [snip] > anyway). I don't think he should be allowed to make the decision for > the rest of us about what is accepted to trunk and what is not. Also I recall a few people agreeing with Fons. Plus, Fons is so frigging thorough that... what should we write? "Yeah!! What he said!" Hardly an important contribution to the discussion. Also, with the reception that Fons got, I'm sure there were a few like me who kept their mouths shut unless they had something important to contribute. Anyway, FWIW, I agreed 100% with Fons... and IIRC he was open to having an in-JACK session management API provided that it played nice with a larger, more comprehensive session manager. (I.e. partial session loading/saving, no client renaming, etc.) -gabriel _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
