On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Adrian Knoth <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 10:33:57AM +0000, alex stone wrote: > >> > The JACK MIDI code was contribued (by me) while H2 was on a feature freeze >> Gabriel, just thinking out loud here, but do you think there's any >> mileage in creating a JACK audio and midi only version of hydrogen? > > How about talking to upstream again and trying to get things merged? > This could mean a lot of work, but in the end, nobody needs the (n+1)th > fork of something. > > And while at it, make it a LV2 plugin. ;) > > > Cheerio > > -- > mail: [email protected] http://adi.thur.de PGP/GPG: key via keyserver > > If nobody answers the front door, knock on the back. > _______________________________________________ > Linux-audio-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev >
Adrian, no offence intended, it's been my user experience that anything that has portaudio or portmidi involved, is prone to challenges. I'm thinking a "pure' jack build here. I'm not sure about hydrogen as an lv2 plugin either. I can't see where this would be useful, although others might disagree, showing valid use cases. Alex. -- www.openoctave.org [email protected] [email protected] _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
