On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 2:34 PM, torbenh <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 02:18:54PM +0300, alex stone wrote: >> I will clarify here that i'm talking about a user experience, before >> the discussion gets into jousting with white papers..... > > ok. so you basically say that midi channels are annoying ? > how about several CC controllers flowing through the same midi connection ? > you think thats bad too ? > > i mean for complex synths this could quickly end up in 20 CV lines > controlling one voice. > > >> >> :) >> >> Alex. >> >> >> >> >> -- >> www.openoctave.org >> >> [email protected] >> [email protected] >> _______________________________________________ >> Linux-audio-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev > > -- > torben Hohn > _______________________________________________ > Linux-audio-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev >
We have midi for automation or controlling synths, plugins, etc, because that's been the malnstream path for development. As far ease of use, midi is inefficient is certain use cases. I don't doubt that with great implementation, midi could do better than it does, but i've yet to see that. Again, this a personal user experience, based on all the previous years of having to use midi for such tasks, and the refreshing change to CV in a software format, that has saved me hours of time already, and ongoing. Alex. -- www.openoctave.org [email protected] [email protected] _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
