On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 9:28 AM, cal <[email protected]> wrote: > rosea grammostola wrote: > > [ ... ] > > All though... it appears that there are at least two existing problems > > right now: > > > > 1. Zynaddsubfx/ yoshimi and probably other standalone synths, doesn't > > have an very good midi mapping. > > 2. Non-Mixer doesn't support LV2 (they are working on dssi, they > > support ladspa) and they are not planning to do so. > > > > > > About point 1, it would be nice if the developers of standalone > > application make automation / midi mapping as good as possible. PHASEX > > seems to be a good example. > > In this context, it might help if you could define "as good as possible". > A common trait among oss developers is that they'll first build what they > want and need, then consider extending further when presented with feature > requests that offer worthwhile value to the general body of users, and > often more importantly, to the dev(s) in question. If you really want > something to change, you'll probably need to spell it out fairly > specifically. Then, you'll usually find there's a good chance of it > happening. But then oss development often reminds me of a sign on the back > wall of a second-hand VW parts place I used to frequent (a lot!) - "Price > may vary according to customer attitude!" > > cheers, Cal >
Hehe, my concern here is the quality of Linux audio especially when it comes to the modular approach and automation. I quoted a guy who has pretty some experience in a studio and with automation I assume. But don't ask me how you should do it, cause I'm the last person who is capable of telling you how it should be in this area ;) But of course it would be nice if such a fine app as zynaddsubfx/ yoshimi is, to have good automation possibilities. If you want, you can start an topic for suggestions. Or talk to the phasex or ams devs. Kind regards, \r
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
