On Saturday 20 March 2010, Paul Davis wrote:
>On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Gene Heskett <[email protected]>
wrote:
>> It is now at least 15 years past due for a new, far faster, and more
>> expressive protocol. Something based on the TOS connector or similar
>> relatively inexpensive hardware interface that can handle 100x midi's
>> traffic on a single, daisy chain-able connection. I'd suggest 1394B, but
>> in a setup and tear down every night scenario, I don't see that as being
>> as rugged as a plastic optical fiber.
>
>uhmmm ... MIDI over USB or MIDI over ethernet is as flexible and fast
>as what you suggest, and already exist. The transport and physical
>layer aspects of MIDI are already going away. What remains is the
>actual message format and contents.
>
>--p
Which is in bad need of a major overhaul itself as I stated. What I'd like
to see is a new protocol statement prepared and an RFQ issued, so that the
whole industry could continue to 'stay on the same page'.
And I just discovered that you sent it privately, but kmail filtered on the
address and put it in the LAD folder. No matter.
At the same time, I don't really have a working oar in this discussion, its
more of a comment along the lines of not seeing history repeat some of its
uglier mistakes over the last 75 years I have been observing it. ;-)
Take Care Paul.
--
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Wash: "Can I suggest something that doesn't involve violence, or is this the
wrong crowd for that?"
--"Serenity"
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
