On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Jack O'Quin <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 8:01 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
> That seems like a good approach. There's a lot to be said for using a > complete programming language for configuration. Python provides > functions, variables, control flow and classes, everything you'd be > likely to need. when i did this with ardour (and a few other projects) back in the early days, when guile was the interpreter of choice, any benefits it brought to the table were negated by its intrusiveness into the overall process structure. moreover, it ended up being overkill for the purpose, and when it was removed and replaced with everybody's bastard child (XML), nothing was lost ... not sure that this applies to fons' planned use of python for this purpose, or if python suffers from the same level of issues that guile did. --p _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
