On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 22:04 +0200, [email protected] wrote: > On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 12:42:49PM -0700, Niels Mayer wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 1:35 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Not really, EQ normally being pre-fader. Post-fader meters in a mixer > > > strip are useful only of the signal being metered is actually one > > > that is physically available on some connector, e.g. as a direct out. > > > It would not indicate any overload that occurs pre-fader. > > > > The only time I've seen EQ pre-frader is low-cut on a microphone > > preamp. > > Then you haven't seen any of the >100 mixers I've seen and > worked on. In fact, as far as I can remember, I've *never* > seen any mixer that had its EQ post-fader. Nor one with > post-fader inserts, and there are good reasons for that. > > Ciao,
Low-cut and EQs should be pre-fader and just the EQs + the fader should be switchable between pre-aux and no EQs + fader for aux, while low-cut always should be pre-aux too. Anything else is very unusual. - Ralf _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
