On 10/11/10 16:35, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote: > On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 03:47:43PM +0200, Robin Gareus wrote: > >> That's 3 steps to much :) > > Are Linux users becoming that lazy ? :-)
LOL. It's the other way 'round: I'm using GNU/Linux because I'm lazy. Solve things once, make a script and be done with it. >> With git it's also easy to keep more than one repo: fi. a private with >> all the small changes and a public where you only push out releases. > > I don't think that my provider (hosteurope) provides a git server. There's a lot free git hosting services (from github over gitorious to sourceforge,..). >> As for the 'sudo make install' - I'm quite reluctant to run that >> command. > > I can't help to spot some contradition there. You would not trust > 'sudo make install', even if you can verify very easily what it's > going to do (just a few lines in the Makefile). or by running `make -n install; echo "really continue? <CTRL-C|ENTER>" read -n 1 ; make install` > But you would trust > a single-command, almost automatic update ? This can do whatever it > wants with your system, even if going through a managed package, > and it's less easy to verify. Packaging happens with 'fakeroot', but yeah you have a point there. However my motivation for bringing all this up in the first place was not about trust but about convenience. I do trust your code and even trust you with my door-key. Are you hinting I should be more careful in the future with installing your software? 8-) Anyhow, if there's not going to be a public git or svn repo I'll just extend my download/compile/package/install script. Actually less work than typing this email.. Cheers! robin _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev