> > > Message: 8 > Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 22:01:50 +0000 > From: Victor Lazzarini <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [LAD] Project proposition: llvm based dsp engine > To: "[email protected] >> The Linux Audio > Developers' Mailing List" <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed"; > DelSp="yes" > > This is all very interesting. One question I had regarding the future > development of FAUST is whether it will include some sort of scheduler > so that various faust-coded objects can be instantiated at different > times, connected together in series, etc.. Then an interpreter could > be developed with JIT compilation etc. > > Or is this more like the idea of combining FAUST with another language > like pure? > > Victor > On 10 Dec 2010, at 12:28, St?phane Letz wrote:
I would say yes. Faust should stay as the DSP computation stage only. Stéphane _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
